From The Blaze:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghazi ahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.From Conservative Daily News:
Today we learn from sources that not only did Hillary ask for added security, and was denied, but her closest advisers strongly suggested she seek legal counsel just days after the attack. Why? Why did “they” deny Hillary’s requests for added security to Benghazi, and why is this a situation in which a Secretary of State would need personal legal counsel? Could the Benghazi fallout, go beyond what a Public Relations firm can handle? I’d say YES. Could this be a criminal act, negligence, dereliction of duty, which resulted in murder? I’d say YES. And I’d say that Hillary is telling the truth as the “source” of these latest developments come straight from her “legal counsel”. Hillary did prior to September 11th, 2012 order added security for Benghazi, and those requests were denied—but by who?Assuming that both of these accounts are true (and I have no reason to believe that they are not), it certainly begs the question as to why Hillary fell on her own sword and took responsibility for the Libyan attack some time afterwards?
Was she trying to protect the President, who was fervently throwing both the State Dept and the Intelligence community under the bus?
And why did she retain personal legal counsel? Was it the legal counsel who advised her to stop trying to cover for her boss, because this scandal has serious criminal negligence charges written all over it?
Really. Enquiring minds want to know.